Análisis Crítico del Discurso: revisión de la crítica
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
El artículo es una revisión de las principales críticas hechas en torno al Análisis Crítico del Discurso (ACD) en los últimos años. Los siguientes son los tópicos tratados: la posición epistemológica del ACD, la teoría lingüística y el enfoque cognitivo que lo sustentan, el papel del analista y el papel de los participantes, la conexión entre los niveles macro y micro, el tratamiento del contexto, el análisis lingüístico, y el tema de la interdisciplinariedad. Finalmente, se discuten los cambios que se han introducido para salirle al paso a la crítica y también la posibilidad de generar impacto.
Billig, M. (1999). Critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis: An exchange between Michael Billig and Emanuel A. Schegloff. Discourse & Society, 10(4), 543-582.
Blommaert, J. (2001). Critique is/as critique. Critique of Anthropology 2(1), 3-32.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge, UK.: Cambridge University Press.
Broderick, A.A. (2004). ‘’Recovery’’, ‘’science’’, and the politics of hope: A critical discourse analysis of applied behavior analysis for young children labeled with autism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Syracuse.
Bucholtz, M. (2001). Reflexivity and critique in discourse analysis. Critique of Anthropology, 21(2), 165-183.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chick, K.J. (1996). Safe-talk: Collusion in apartheid education. In Coleman, H. (Ed.). Society and the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21-39.
Chilton, P. (2005). Missing links in CDA: Modules, blends and the critical instinct. In R. Wodak, R & Chilton, P. (2005). A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory, methodology, and interdisciplinary. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 19-52.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1996). Technologisation of discourses. In Caldas-Coulthard, C.R. & Coulthard, M. (Eds.). Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge, 71-83.
Fairclough, N. (1996). A reply to Henry Widdowson’s ‘Discourse analysis: A critical view’. Language and Literature, 5(1), 49-56.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. 2nd Ed. Edinburgh: Pearson Education. Chapters on three steps in the methodology.
Fowler, R. (1996). On critical linguistics. In Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. & Coulthard, M. (Eds.). Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge, 3-14.
Gee, J.P. (2004). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In Rogers, R. (Ed.). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education). Mahwah, N. J.: London, 19-50.
Gee, J.P. (2005a). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. 2nd Ed. London: Routledge.
Gee, J.P. (2005b). Critical discourse analysis. In R. Beach, J. Green, M. Kamil, & T. Shanalian (Eds.). Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research 2nd Ed. Cresshill,J.J.: Hampton Press, 293-318.
Hymes, D. (1996). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice. London: Taylor & Francis.
Irvine, J. & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, P. (Ed.). Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities and identities. Santa Fe, N.M.: School of American Research Press, 35-84.
Johnson, E. (2005). War in the media: Metaphors, ideology and the formation of language policy. Bilingual Research Journal, 29(3), 621-640.
Johnstone, B. (2002). Discourse analysis. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
Jorgensen, M. & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.
Kumagai, Y. (2004). (De)Mystifying literacy practices in Foreign Language classroom: A critical discourse analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Kress, G. (1993). Language as ideology. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. (1996). Representational resources and the production of subjectivity: questions for the theoretical development of critical discourse analysis in a multicultural society. In Caldas-Coulthard, C.R. & Coulthard, M. (Eds.). Texts and practices: Reading in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge, 15-31.
Kubota, R. (2001). Discursive Construction of the Images of U.S. Classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 9-38.
Kumaradively, R. (1999). Critical classroom discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly 33(39, 453-484.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lewis, C. & Ketter, J. (2004). Learning as social interaction: Interdiscursivity in a a teacher and researcher study group. In Rogers, R. (Ed.). Critical discourse analysis in education. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 117-147.
Macbeth, D. (2003). Hugh Mehan’s Learning Lessons Reconsidered: On the differences between the naturalistic and critical analysis of classroom discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 239-280.
McClean, M. (2005). Language and Leadership: Exploring the relationship between critical and the hegemonic construction of student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Florida Atlantic University.
Mey, I. (2001). The CA/CDA Controversy.Journal of Pragmatics, 2001, 33, 4, Apr, 609-615.
Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: positioning of the approaches to CDA. In Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (Eds.). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage, 14-31.
Mills, S. (2004). Discourse. London: Routledge.
O’Halloran, K. (2003). critical discourse analysis and language cognition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Prieto, F. P. (2001). ‘Why Do They Hit the Headlines?’ Critical Media Literacy in the Foreign Class. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 22(1), 33-49.
Rogers, R. (2004a). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. In Rogers, R. (Ed.). An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Mahwah, N. J.: London,1-18.
Rogers, R. (2004b).Setting an agenda for critical discourse analysis in education. In Rogers, R. (Ed.). In Rogers, R. (Ed.). An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Mahwah, N. J.: London, 237-254.
Rogers, R. (2004c). A critical discourse analysis of literate identities across contexts: Alignment and conflict. In Rogers, R. (Ed.). An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 51-78.
Santa Ana, O. (1999). ‘Like an animal I was treated’: anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & Society, 10(2), 191-224.
Sarroub, L. (2004). Reframing for decisions: Transforming talk about literacy assessment among teachers and researchers. In Rogers, R. (Ed.). Critical discourse analysis in education. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 97-116.
Schegloff, E. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society, 8(2), 165-187.
Schegloff, E. A. (1999). What is next?: Language and social interaction study at the century’s turn. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(1&2), 141-148.
Sheuer, J. (2003). Habitus as the principle for social practice: A proposal for critical discourse analysis. Language in Society, 32, 143-175.
Slembrouck, S. (2001). Explanation, interpretation and critique in the analysis of discourse. Critique of Anthropology, 21(1), 33-57.
Stevens, L. P. (2004). Locating the role of the critical discourse analyst. In In Rogers, R. (Ed.). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. Mahwah, N. J.: London, 172-224.
Stubbs, M. (1997). Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis. In Wray, A. & Ryan, A. (Eds.). Evolving models of language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 100-116.
Toolan, M. (1997). What is critical discourse analysis and why are people saying such terrible things about it? Language and Literature, 6, 83-103.
van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schäffner & A.L. Wenden (Eds.). Language and peace. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 17-33.
van Dijk, T. A. (1996). Discourse, power and access. In Caldas-Coulthard, C.R. & Coulthard, M. (Eds.). Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge, 84-104.
van Dijk, T. (2001a). Critical Discourse Analysis (352-371). In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton. (Eds.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
van Dijk, T. (2001b). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (Eds.). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage, 95-120.
van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Three models of interdisciplinary. In Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (Ed.). New agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity. Philadelphia, P.A, USA: John Benjamins, 3-18.
Verschueren, J. (2001). Predicaments of criticism. Critique of Anthropology. 2181), 59-81.
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analyses and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387-412.
Widdowson, H. G. (2000). On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 3-25.
Widdowson, H. G. (2004). Text, context, and pretext: Critical issues in discourse analysis. Malden, Ma.: Blackwell.
Willig, C. (Ed.). (1999). Applied discourse analysis: Social and psychological interventions. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. London: Longman.
Wodak, R. (1999). Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century. Research on language and social interaction, 32(1&2), 185-193.
Wodak, R. (Ed.) (2005). New agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity. Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins.
Aceptado 2017-07-19
Publicado 2007-06-28