Aprendizaje de lenguas en línea en la educación de posgrado en Colombia: percepciones de los estudiantes a partir de un estudio tipo encuesta
Palabras clave:
aprendizaje de lenguas en línea, educación de posgrado, encuesta, percepciones estudiantilesBarra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Este estudio por encuesta investigó las percepciones de estudiantes de posgrado sobre cursos de inglés con fines académicos (EAP, por sus siglas en inglés) en línea y basados en habilidades. Se recopilaron datos mediante una encuesta que obtuvo 181 respuestas válidas. Para el análisis de datos se utilizó estadística descriptiva e inferencial y análisis de contenido. Los hallazgos revelaron una percepción favorable de la modalidad de aprendizaje en línea, las prácticas docentes de los tutores y los procesos de evaluación. Los estudiantes valoraron la flexibilidad, la accesibilidad y el diseño estructurado de los cursos. En contraste, la percepción de los estudiantes sobre el aprendizaje de la lengua fue más baja, lo que indica la necesidad de materiales más interactivos y pertinentes. Si bien los estudiantes reportaron avances en el desarrollo de la autonomía, también se observaron desafíos como la falta de motivación y la orientación limitada por parte de los tutores. El estudio sugiere integrar tareas auténticas específicas de cada disciplina, fortalecer la formación de tutores y equilibrar las interacciones sincrónicas y asincrónicas para optimizar las experiencias de aprendizaje de lenguas en línea en contextos EAP.
Aloka, P. J. O., Ajayi, O., Zindoga, L., & Mnyamana, N. (2023). Psychological barriers on adjustment to online teaching and learning in universities during COVID-19 pandemic: A social justice perspective. In F. Maringe & O. Chiramba (Eds.), Online teaching and learning in the COVID-19 era (Chap. 5). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42402-1_5
Anuradha, C. S., & Hymavathi, A. (2024). Online higher education: Challenges, opportunities, and the path forward. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 6(2).
Al-Hawamleh, M. S., Alazemi, A. F., Al-Jamal, D. A. H., Al Shdaifat, S., & Rezaei Gashti, Z. (2022). Online learning and self-regulation strategies: Learning guides matter. Education Research International, Article 4175854. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4175854
Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Athabasca University Press.
Artino, A. R., La Rochelle, J.S., Dezee, K. J., & Gehlbach, H. (2014). Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Medical Teacher, 36(6), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.889814
Bazán-Ramírez, A., Quispe-Morales, R., Huauya-Quispe, P., & Ango-Aguilar, H. (2020). Accessibility, difficulties and advantages of the online study for COVID-19 in a presential postgraduate on education. Propósitos y Representaciones, 8(SPE3), e659. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2020.v8nSPE3.659
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and Researching: Autonomy in Language Learning (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833767
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning (2nd ed.). Georgetown University Press.
Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2021). Critical design elements in online courses. Distance Education, 42(3), 352-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1956301
Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 14–25). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964309
Cabı, E., & Kalelioğlu, F. (2019). A fully online course experience from students’ perspective: Readiness, attitudes and thoughts. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(3), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.601934
Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
Castañeda-Trujillo, J. E., & Jaime-Osorio, M. F. (2021). Pedagogical strategies used by English teacher educators to overcome the challenges posed by emergency remote teaching during the COVID‑19 pandemic. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 26(3), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala/v26n3a12
Check, J., & Schutt, R. K. (2012). Research methods in education. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2018). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Daniel, M. C., Schumacher, G., Stelter, N., & Riley, C. (2016). Student perception of online learning in ESL bilingual teacher preparation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 561–569. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040313
De Chazal, E. (2014). English for academic purposes: A comprehensive overview of EAP and how it is best taught and learnt in a variety of academic contexts (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2022). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003331926
Ebadi, S., & Dadgar, M. (2024). The effects of multimodal online feedback delivery on the writing skills of EFL learners. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 25(3), 148–171. https://callej.org/index.php/journal/article/view/439
Estrella, F. (2023). The effectiveness of using digital platforms to practice English during the COVID-19 crisis as perceived by Ecuadorian students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2021-0194
Espitia, M., & Cruz, C. (2013). Peer-feedback and online interaction: A case study. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 18(2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.14519
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Online Learning Journal, 11(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i1.1737
Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554-561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865
González‑Lloret, M. (2020). Collaborative tasks for online language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 53(3), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12466
Hernández, H. H., Gomez, L., Valderrama, C. J., Bernal, O. R. B., Hildebrand, J., Valenzuela, R. C., Castillo, M. E. C., Sandoval, F. J., Valero, M. N., Salazar, E., Muñoz, E. F., & Huss, V. F. (2024). Lecciones aprendidas de tres universidades latinoamericanas sobre la enseñanza remota durante la pandemia COVID-19: Un análisis de las experiencias de enseñanza-aprendizaje durante y después del confinamiento. Calidad En La Educación, 61, 139–188 https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n61.1473
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Pergamon.
Hurskaya, V. (2024, April 12). Current trends and directions in teaching English as a foreign language online. Science, Education, Society: Trends and Development Prospects, 51–57). https://doi.org/10.21661/r-562054
Kamaruzaman, F. M., Sulaiman, N. A., & Shaid, N. A. N. (2021). A Study on Perception of Students’ Readiness towards Online Learning During Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(7), 1536–1548. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i7/10488
Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318
Konstantinidou, A., & Nisiforou, E. A. (2022). Assuring the quality of online learning in higher education: Adaptations in design and implementation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7910
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE Publications.
Lee, S., & Michelini, A. (2025). Beyond convenience: A mixed-methods study of asynchronous multimodal tutoring and its impact on understanding and connection. Writing Center Journal, 43(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.2034
Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt040.0
Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Miknis, M. (2020). Using rubrics to improve the assessment lifecycle. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(7), 1018 – 1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1816843
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Park, C., & Kim, D. (2020). Perception of instructor presence and its effects on learning experience in online classes. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 475-488. https://doi.org/10.28945/4611
Pineda Hoyos, J. E., & Tamayo Cano, L. H. (2016). E-moderating and e-tivities: The implementation of a workshop to develop online teaching skills in in-service teachers. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 18(1), 97-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n1.44269.
Pineda Hoyos, J. E., Tamayo Cano, L. H., & Peralta, M. A. (2021). An inquiry-based framework for teaching English in synchronous environments: Perceptions from teachers and learners. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 11(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2021010103
Reinders, H., & White, C. (2011). Learner autonomy and new learning environments. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44254
Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students' satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Samara, M., Algdah, A., Nassar, Y. H., Zahra, S. A., Halim, M., & Barsom, R. M. M. (2023). How did online learning impact the academic performance of graduate students amid the covid-19 pandemic? A case study of the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(3), 869-865. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2057
Segovia-García, N., & Said-Hung, E. (2021). Factores de satisfacción de los alumnos en e-learning en Colombia. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 26(89), 595-621.
Stanchevici, D., & Siczek, M. (2019). Performance, Interaction, and Satisfaction of Graduate EAP Students in a Face-to-Face and an Online Class: A Comparative Analysis. TESL Canada Journal, 36(3), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v36i3.1324
Stanley, D., & Montero Fortunato, Y. R. (2022). The efficacy of online higher education in Latin America: A systematic literature review. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje, 17(3), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2022.3191299
Silverman, D. (2019). Interpreting Qualitative Data (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Takona, J. P. (2023). Flipping the script: Post-COVID-19 opportunities, challenges, and threats amidst the digital revolution in higher education. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), 5(4), 847-863. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.569
Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2022). Teaching and learning languages online: Challenges and responses. System, 107, 102819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102819
Universidad de Antioquia. (2015). Acuerdo Académico 493 del 3 de diciembre de 2015: Regula los criterios y requisitos de competencia en lengua extranjera y segunda lengua para los estudiantes de posgrados. https://www.udea.edu.co/wps/wcm/connect/udea/b7b74462-6b68-4ed7-bc6e-857012c61a42/Acuerdo493.pdf
Walker, S. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing distance education learning environments in higher education: The Distance Education Learning Environments Survey (DELES). Learning Environments Research, 8(3), 289-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-1568-3
Wilhelm-Chapin, M. K., & Koszalka, T. A. (2020). Graduate Students’ Use and Perceived Value of Learning Resources in Learning the Content in an Online Course. TechTrends, 64, 361 - 372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00464-5
Yastibas, A. E., & Yastibas, G. C. (2015). The use of e-portfolio-based assessment to develop students’ self-regulated learning in English language teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.437
Yemenici, A. İ., & Karakaş Yıldırım, Ö. (2023). A research on online self-regulated learning skills of pre-service Turkish teachers. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 6(4), 1062–1077. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1334825
Yeşilyurt, F. (2021). The learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and university students’ perceptions. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 8(1), 29–42.
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778
Zhou, Y., Zhou, Y., & Machtmes, K. (2024). Mixed methods integration strategies used in education: A systematic review. Methodological Innovations, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991231217937
Downloads
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.