Contenido principal del artículo

Autores

Este estudio exploratorio cualitativo profundiza en los usos, consideraciones éticas, retos y oportunidades percibidos por los actores involucrados sobre las tecnologías generativas impulsadas por inteligencia artificial para los procesos de enseñanza, aprendizaje y evaluación de lenguas. Por medio de cuestionarios abiertos y grupos focales, los cuales fueron analizados mediante análisis de contenido, se compiló una muestra de 195 estudiantes, 35 profesores y dos directores de dos programas de pregrado en enseñanza del inglés. Los hallazgos muestran un creciente uso y aceptación de estas tecnologías entre los miembros de la academia, con estrategias emergentes para fomentar los procesos de aprendizaje, enseñanza y evaluación. Sin embargo, se plantean amenazas y preocupaciones éticas como la pérdida de habilidades fundamentales, confianza y autenticidad entre los actores involucrados. Se hace un llamado a adoptar un enfoque crítico y colaborativo, así como a diseñar políticas democráticas para integrar la IA generativa en la educación y evaluación de idiomas.

Daniel Murcia, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA

Es becario Fulbright MinCiencias de doctorado en el programa de Lingüística Aplicada de la Facultad de Liberal Arts, de la Universidad Estatal de Pensilvania. Sus intereses académicos y de investigación incluyen la evaluación lingüística, la evaluación automatizada de la escritura y el análisis del discurso en el ámbito de la inteligencia artificial.

Maria Fernanda Jaime Osorio, Universidad Surcolombiana, Neiva, Colombia

Tiene una maestría en Enseñanza del Inglés como Lengua Extranjera por la Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana. Sus intereses de investigación giran en torno a las prácticas pedagógicas de los docentes en servicio y el uso de las TIC en ELT. Actualmente es profesora asociada y vicerrectora de asuntos académicos de la Universidad Surcolombiana.

Luis Felipe Jaramillo Calderon, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, Colombia

Es profesor e investigador de la Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira. Tiene una maestría en Educación Bilingüe de la misma universidad. Es miembro del grupo de investigación Poliglosia. Sus intereses de investigación son la Educación Bilingüe, la Evaluación del Lenguaje, las tecnologías emergentes en educación y el desarrollo de la lectoescritura.

Yimmy Alexander Hoyos Pipicano, Secretaría de Educación del Huila, Algeciras, Colombia

Tiene una maestría en Didáctica del Inglés de la Universidad Surcolombiana y una licenciatura en Enseñanza del Inglés de la Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira. Actualmente es profesor de tiempo completo en un colegio público del Huila y está interesado en explorar la educación para la justicia social en ELT. Hace parte del grupo de investigación ILESEARCH adscrito a la Universidad Surcolombiana.

Murcia, D., Jaime Osorio, M. F., Jaramillo Calderon, L. F., & Hoyos Pipicano, Y. A. (2025). La IAGen en la enseñanza, el aprendizaje y la evaluación de lenguas: Percepciones de grupos de interés en dos programas de pregrado en idiomas. Lenguaje, 53(1S), e20314387. https://doi.org/10.25100/lenguaje.v53i1S.14387

Bax, S. (2003). CALL-past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00071-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00071-4

Bax, S. (2018). MOOCs as a new technology: Approaches to normalising the MOOC experience for our learners; paper posthumously transcribed by Marina Orsini-Jones. In M. Orsini-Jones & S. Smith (Eds.), Flipping the blend through MOOCs, MALL and OIL- new direction in CALL (pp. 9-16). Research-publishing net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.23.785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.23.785

Bekou, A., Ben Mhamed, M., & Assissou, K. (2024). Exploring opportunities and challenges of using ChatGPT in English language teaching (ELT) in Morocco. Focus on ELT Journal, 6(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.14744/felt.6.1.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/felt.6.1.7

Bewersdorff, A., Seßler, K., Baur, A., Kasneci, E., & Nerdel, C. (2023). Assessing student errors in experimentation using artificial intelligence and large language models: A comparative study with human raters. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, e100177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100177

Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-In-The-Loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, e100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068

Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(4), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z

Bower, J., & Christensen, C. (1995). Disruptive technologies: catching the wave. Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 43–53. https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.elsevier-315e6fb9-6d1b-39e4-9036-cb79369f2c2c

Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Farrow, R., Bai, J. Y. H., Nerantzi, C., Moore, S., Dron J., Stracke, C. M., Singh, L., Crompton. H., Koutropoulos, A., Terentev, E., Pazurek, A., Nichols, M., Sidorkin, A. M., Costello, E., Watson, S., Mulligan, D., Honeychurch, S., …, Asino, T. I. (2024). The Manifesto for Teaching and Learning in a Time of Generative AI: A Critical Collective Stance to Better Navigate the Future. Open Praxis,16(4), 487–513. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.777

Carless, D. (2023, june 8). Assessment and feedback redesign for the generative AI era [Conference presentation]. CUHK Generative AI conference, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.

Castañeda-Trujillo, J. E., (2021). Pedagogical strategies used by English teacher educators to overcome the challenges posed by emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Íkala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 26(3), 697–713. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala/v26n3a12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala/v26n3a12

Chiu, T., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, e100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118

Cinganotto, L. (2023). Learning technologies for ELT during the pandemic in Italy: Teachers’ attitudes. In S. Kourieos, & D. Evripidou (Eds.), Language teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Shift to a new era (pp. 37-57). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Claro, M. F., Díaz, C. D., & Román, K. J. (2024). Incorporating artificial intelligence and gamification in EFL education: Strategies for enhancing teaching and learning outcomes of EFL teachers [Master’s thesis, Universidad Santo Tomás]. USTA Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/11634/55866

Corbin, T., Dawson, P., & Liu, D. (2025). Talk is cheap: why structural assessment changes are needed for a time of GenAI. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2503964 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2503964

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Edmett, A., Ichaporia, N., Crompton, H., & Crichton, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence and English language teaching: Preparing for the future. British Council. https://doi.org/10.57884/78ea-3c69

España, J. A. (2023). Kahoot, Quizizz, and Quizalize in the English class and their impact on motivation. HOW, 30(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.30.1.641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19183/how.30.1.641

Galaczi, E. (2023). English language education in the era of generative AI: our perspective. Cambridge Press.

Gómez-Orjuela, Y. R. (2021). Digital skills for communication and content creation: Can B-learning greatly influence them? HOW, 28(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.28.1.568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19183/how.28.1.568

Guio, A., Muñoz, V., & Tamayo, E. (2021). The Colombian case: adopting collaborative

governance as a path for implementing ethical artificial intelligence. Universidad de

San Andrés. http://hdl.handle.net/10908/18743

Hidayah, N. S., Hasyim, F. Z., & Yunita, V. (2023). Empowering language assessment: The pioneering role of artificial intelligence. Dewantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora, 2(3), 262-269.https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v2i3.1578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v2i3.1587

Hoyos-Pipicano, Y. A., & Jaime-Osorio, M. F. (in press). Technology normalisation in rural education: Public school teachers’ narratives from Colombia. Educación y Educadores.

Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023). Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 112-131. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0009

Inbar‐Lourie, O., & Donitsa‐Schmidt, S. (2009). Exploring classroom assessment practices: the case of teachers of English as a foreign language. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(2), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903075958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903075958

Inoue, A. B. (2023) Labor-Based Grading Contracts. Building Equity and Inclusion in the Writing Classroom (2nd ed.). The WAC Clearinghouse. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2022.1824

Jamshed, M., Alam, I., Sultan, S. A., & Banu, S. (2024). Using artificial intelligence for English language learning: Saudi EFL learners’ opinions, attitudes and challenges. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 11(1), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v11i1.5397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v11i1.5397

Juárez-Díaz, C., & Perales, M. D. (2019). Experiencias en el aprendizaje de inglés en la educación superior. Lenguaje, 47(2), 358-378. https://doi.org/10.25100/lenguaje.v47i2.6734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25100/lenguaje.v47i2.6734

Juárez-Díaz, C., & Perales, M. (2021). Language teachers’ emergency remote teaching experiences during the COVID-19 confinement. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 23(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v23n2.90195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v23n2.90195

Kurni, M., Mohammed, M. S., & Srinivasa, K. G. (2023). A beginner’s guide to introduce artificial intelligence in teaching and learning. Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32653-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32653-0

Kusuma, I. P. I. (2022). EFL preservice teachers’ technology integration in managing and teaching speaking skills during emergency remote teaching. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 24(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v24n2.97497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v24n2.97497

Li, M., Enkhtur, A., Cheng, F., & Yamamoto, B. A. (2024). Ethical implications of ChatGPT in higher education: A scoping review. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 13(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.14378

Makeleni, S., Mutongoza, B. H., & Linake, M. A. (2023). Language education and artificial intelligence: An exploration of challenges confronting academics in global South universities. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 6(2), 158-171. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2023.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2023.14

McLaren, P. (2014). Life in schools. An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (6th ed.). Paradigm Publishers.

Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E. (2016). Qualitative research: a guide to implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Ministerio de Ciencias, Tecnología e Innovación. (2024). Hoja de ruta para el desarrollo y aplicación de la inteligencia artificial en Colombia. Gobierno Nacional de Colombia.

Owan, V., Abang, K., Idika, D., Etta, O., & Bassey, (2023). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), em2307. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13428

Panizzon, D. (2019). Assessment, learning and teaching – a symbiotic relationship. In Grady, V. & Dawson, V. (Eds.), The art of teaching science (3rd ed., pp. 140-158). Allen & Unwin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117896-11

Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SagePublications.

Pelletier, K., Robert, J., Muscanell, N., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., & Grajek, S. (2023). EDUCAUSE Horizon Report. Teaching and Learning Edition. EDUCAUSE Publications. https://www.educause.edu/horizon-report-teaching-and-learning-2023

Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2015). Computerized Dynamic Assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing, 32(3), 337–357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214560390

Rahman, M. M. (2023). Sample size determination for survey research and non-probability sampling techniques: A review and set of recommendations. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, 11(1), 42-62. http://www.scientificia.com/index.php/JEBE/article/view/201

Ricart, A. (2024). ChatGPT as a tool to improve written expression in English as a foreign language. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 29(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.354584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.354584

Rhokila, R., Akhmadalieva, D., & Matlubaxon, A. (2023). Using computers and online technologies in teaching English. Scientific Focus, 1(8), 996-1000. http://nauchniyimpuls.ru/index.php/sf/article/view/13524

Romero, M., Reyes, J., & Kostakos, P. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education. In A. Urmeneta, & M. Romero (Eds.), Creative Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 129-143). Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55272-4_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55272-4_10

Salas-Pilco, S.Z., & Yang, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(21), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00326-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00326-w

Serafimovska, S. (2023). The effects of blended learning and smart technologies on ELT. Lambert Academic Publishing. https://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/32095/

Singha, S., Singha, R., & Jasmine, E. (2024). Enhancing language teaching materials through artificial intelligence. In F. Pan. (Ed), AI in Language Teaching, Learning, and Assessment (pp. 22–42). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0872-1.ch002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0872-1.ch002

Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. The Guilford Press.

Strasser, T. (2023). ELT in the digital age: We have come a long way. Works in English and American Studies, 48(1), 121-146. https://doi.org/10.24053/AAA-2023-0006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24053/AAA-2023-0006

Sued, G. E. (2023). A Cultural vision of algorithms: Agency, practices, and resistance in Latin America. In M. Cebral-Loureda, E. G. Rincón-Flores, & G. Sanchez-Ante, (Eds.), What can I do: Strengths and limitations of artificial intelligence (pp. 53-68). Chapman and Hall/CRC https://doi.org/10.1201/b23345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b23345

Trace, J. (2021). Classroom assessment and assessment as learning. In H. Mohebbi, & C. Coombe (Eds.), Research questions in language education and applied linguistics: A reference guide (pp. 317-322). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79143-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79143-8_56

Villegas-Torres, P. (2022). The use of social networks in L2 instruction: Discussing its opportunities and obstacles. HOW, 29(1), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.29.1.622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19183/how.29.1.622